Skip to main content
· 1/19/1920

Ex parte Schnabel y Ruiz

Citations

  • 11 P.R. Fed. 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating counsel “are not ineffective because they fail to conceive, research, and raise every novel argument that has a chance to prevail”
  • “Defendant concedes that this argument has since been resolved to the contrary in [Jones], which held that the guidelines do not limit controlled substances to only those substances so defined under federal law.”
  • acknowledging its precedent that the Guidelines commentary is authoritative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.