Skip to main content
· 2/22/1993

Ex Parte Reichlyn

Citations

  • 427 S.E.2d 661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding judgment entered in violation of the automatic stay in a bankruptcy proceeding is void because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to take any action inconsistent with the stay
  • declaring a judgment void when the judgment was entered during the pendency of the bankruptcy stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.