Ex parte Raynes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the victim’s “guesstimate” of the cost of repairs to a wall and office door, without any stated basis for the estimate, was legally insufficient to support the restitution amount
• striking a restitution order based on the victim’s offer of a “guesstimate” as to the cost of repairs
• finding testimony insufficient where “the victim offered a ‘guesstimate’ of the cost of repairs to the wall and office door damaged by the bullet appellant fired, but he admitted that there was no basis for this estimate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).