Ex Parte Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Certainly, it appears that discovery not requiring [the civil defendant] either to testify or produce documents could continue without putting [the defendant] in a position that might call for him to incriminate himself in order to comply.”
• Court denied a writ of mandamus requested by an attorney who had been denied a stay of civil proceedings pending resolution of a criminal investigation of him, holding that his Fifth Amendment rights could be adequately protected while the civil case proceeded in some limited way
• Court denied a writ of mandamus requested by an attorney who had been denied a stay of civil proceedings pending resolution of a criminal investigation of him, holding that his Fifth Amendment rights could be adequately protected while the civil case proceeded in some limited way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Ebbers
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-07-11· cited 44×
• Ex Parte Windom
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-02-11· cited 26×
• Ex Parte Price
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1997-11-14· cited 10×
• Ex Parte Oliver
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-05-09· cited 7×
• Braden v. Jim Bishop Chevrolet, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-09-24· cited 4×
• Wood ex rel. Wood v. Oliver
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-05-09
• Retirement Systems of Alabama v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-07-11

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Bloodsaw
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1994-09-02· cited 39×
• Ex Parte Coastal Training Institute
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-07-26· cited 28×
• Ex Parte White
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-06-06· cited 23×