Ex parte Preston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ―The return of an indictment establishes probable cause as a matter of law. Therefore, the question of probable cause to hold appellant has been rendered moot.‖
• “The return of an indictment establishes probable cause as a matter of law. Therefore, the question of probable cause to hold appellant has been rendered moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Plumb
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-03-19· cited 40×
• Ex Parte Brent Benefield
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-01-17
• Tom Benson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-05-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Sellers
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-12-18· cited 11×
• Ex parte Johnston
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-25· cited 7×
• Ex parte White
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-01· cited 6×