Ex Parte Perales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, notwithstanding applicant’s waiver of appellate rights, no-evidence claim “cognizable” on habeas
• holding that, notwithstanding applicant’s waiver of appellate rights, no-evidence claim was “cognizable” on habeas
• holding that, notwithstanding applicant’s waiver of appellate rights, no-evidence claim was “cognizable” on habeas
• holding that, notwithstanding applicant's waiver of appellate rights, no-evidence claim \cognizable\ on habeas
• finding that “sufficiency of the evidence” claims are not cognizable whereas claims for “no evidence” are cognizable
• agreeing with habeas court’s recommendation for habeas relief, despite guilty plea, where later appellate court construction of penal statute precluded guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).