Skip to main content
· 12/30/1999

Ex Parte Panell

Citations

  • 756 So. 2d 862
  • 1999 WL 1268388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plurality opinion of three Justices, but all six remaining Justices concurred in the result, thus joining in the decision for prospective relief only
  • plurality opinion of three Justices, but all six remaining Justices concurred in the result, thus joining in the decision for prospective relief only
  • \the limitations period [in § 6-5-574 ] begins to run on the date the injury or harm occurs and not on the date of the occurrence of the act that caused the injury or harm\
  • main opinion and all special writings
  • main opinion and all special writings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: See

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.