U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota· 5/5/1900

Ex parte Ortiz

Citations

100 F. 955
1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4318

Judges: Loohren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United States
Customs and Patent Appeals· 1915-05-26· cited 26×
State v. Antoine
Washington Supreme Court· 1973-07-12· cited 9×
United States ex rel. Seymour v. Fischer
D. Nebraska· 1922-02-27· cited 5×
Lazarou v. Moraros
Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1958-07-01· cited 3×
American Sugar Refining Co. v. Bidwell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1903-08-07· cited 3×
Madsen v. Kinsella, Warden
Fourth Circuit· 1951-04-02· cited 2×
Armstrong v. Bidwell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1903-08-07· cited 2×
Ex parte Edwards
Hawaii Supreme Court· 1900-10-09· cited 1×
Crossman v. United States
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1900-12-13· cited 1×
Ex parte Townsend
D. Nebraska· 1904-11-11· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Ex Parte Milligan
Supreme Court· 1867-01-22· cited 531×
Edye v. Robertson
Supreme Court· 1884-12-22· cited 500×
Thurlow v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court· 1847-03-18· cited 427×
Whitney v. Robertson
Supreme Court· 1888-01-09· cited 353×
The Chinese Exclusion Case
Supreme Court· 1889-05-13· cited 251×
National Bank v. County of Yankton
Supreme Court· 1880-05-10· cited 135×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.