Ex parte Oliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applicant’s claim not moot after service of sentence because he remained “subject to the possibility of constraints on his liberty due to the existence of a prior felony conviction on his record.”
• applicant’s claim not moot after service of sentence because he remained “subject to the possibility of constraints on his liberty due to the existence of a prior felony conviction on his record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DeVaughn v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-13· cited 294×
• Ex Parte Renier
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 147×
• In re Chandler
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-02-15· cited 15×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Ormsby
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-19· cited 29×
• Daniels v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-08· cited 22×
• Ex Parte Fontenot
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-03· cited 14×
• Ex Parte McClain
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 8×