Skip to main content

Ex parte Nelson

Citations

  • 546 S.W.3d 742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of relief after deciding that writ application failed to show that claim was not ascertainable through exercise of reasonable diligence
  • determining 10 that applicant was not entitled to relief requested in subsequent application under article 11.072 where claims in subsequent application were “nearly identical” to those from earlier application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higley, Jennings, Keyes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.