Ex parte Neal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a photocopy of a registration of a television was admissible under § 12-21-44 \which deals with photocopies of business records\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cochran v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-04-24· cited 123×
• Ex Parte Thomas
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1984-08-24· cited 68×
• Lidge v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-04-20· cited 57×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-10-04· cited 54×
• Buchannon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-05-12· cited 34×
• Neal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-06-12· cited 16×
• Pickett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-08-16· cited 15×
• Curry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-08-12· cited 1×