Supreme Court of Alabama· 10/31/2003
Ex Parte Moore
Citations
- 880 So. 2d 1131
- 2003 WL 22463384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \`\The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to the intent of the legislature as manifested in the language of the statute.\'\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte McCormickSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-11-23· cited 42×
- Horne v. TGM Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2010-08-20· cited 42×
- Woods v. Suntrust Bank, 2090627 (ala.civ.app. 9-16-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-09-16· cited 13×
- Ex Parte Movie Gallery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2009-09-04· cited 10×
- Shamburger v. LambertCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-05-29· cited 10×
- NP Dodge Mgmt. Co. v. HolcombNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-07-21· cited 10×
- State v. LupoSupreme Court of Alabama· 2007-10-12· cited 9×
- Rudolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-10-23· cited 4×
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-02-06· cited 3×
- Beecham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-07-12· cited 2×
- Simmons v. DuBose Construction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2012-03-16· cited 2×
- Murry v. City of AbbevilleSupreme Court of Alabama· 2008-06-06· cited 1×
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-12-14· cited 1×
- Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-07-12
- Habel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2018-03-16
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-11-23
- In Re Mercy Housing Management Group Inc. v. Naomi Bermudez.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2024-10-21
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 1,582×
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 1,257×
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court· 1969-11-10· cited 1,046×
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court· 1830-02-18· cited 609×
- Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court· 1974-04-24· cited 407×
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-09-24· cited 386×
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court· 1891-04-27· cited 334×
- Whitehead v. ShattuckSupreme Court· 1891-01-26· cited 265×
- Wooddell v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 71Supreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 239×
- Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-07-31· cited 150×
- Ex Parte State Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama· 1996-06-07· cited 99×
- Bean Dredging v. Alabama Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-02-14· cited 96×
- Ex Parte Drill Parts & Service Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-11-22· cited 90×
- Barbara S. Waldrop v. Southern Company Services, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1994-06-29· cited 60×
- Ex Parte Weaver WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-06-27· cited 55×
- City of Mobile v. Gulf Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1965-01-21· cited 40×
- Ex Parte Central Bank of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama· 1996-02-23· cited 40×
- Boring v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1850-01-15· cited 37×
- Ex Parte CuppsSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-10-20· cited 25×
- Ex Parte Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama· 1952-10-09· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.