Supreme Court of Alabama· 6/28/2002
Ex Parte Miles
Citations
- 841 So. 2d 242
- 2002 WL 1398027
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inmate did not receive notice of denial of petition and \to not allow Miles an opportunity to file a notice of appeal under these circumstances would violate his clear legal right to procedural due process\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court· 2012-01-18· cited 724×
- Maples v. AllenEleventh Circuit· 2009-10-26· cited 16×
- Harris v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama· 2012-09-21· cited 12×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-05-23· cited 5×
- Ex Parte MaplesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-01-23· cited 3×
- Ex Parte SerioSupreme Court of Alabama· 2004-06-18· cited 2×
- Schillinger Place, L.L.C. v. Cay-Chel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-06-18
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-09-24· cited 386×
- Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-07-31· cited 150×
- Ex Parte Drill Parts & Service Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-11-22· cited 90×
- Ex Parte WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-10-09· cited 62×
- Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2001-06-08· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.