· 7/11/2025
Ex parte Michael Lee Ledbetter PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Michael Lee Ledbetter v. State of Alabama) (Madison Circuit Court: CC-23-2835; Criminal Appeals: CR-2024-0284).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the respondent’s angry behavior towards the peti- tioner after their divorce was not sufficient for the imminent danger require- ment when there was no abuse after their separation, and the only threat had been communicated before the petitioner left the home
- defining “imminent” to mean “ready to take place,” “near at hand,” “impending,” “hanging threateningly over one’s head,” and “menacingly near”
- “An evidentiary record may support a range of fac- tual inferences about the extent to which a respondent is likely to engage in abusive conduct.”
- a totality-of-circumstances analysis could con- sider whether, after the wife moved out of the parties’ home, the danger to her changed
- appellate court accepts reasonable inferences and credibility choices made by trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.