Ex parte McKenzie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case to the trial court to “determine if it is possible to conduct a nunc pro tunc competency hearing and, if it is, to hold such a hearing” under the then-extant competency-to-stand-trial statute
• remanding case to the trial court to “determine if it is possible to conduct a nunc pro tunc competency hearing and, if it is, to hold such a hearing” under the then-extant competency-to-stand-trial statute
• remanding case to the trial court to “determine if it is possible to conduct a nunc pro tunc competency hearing and, if it is, to hold such a hearing” under the then-extant competency-to- stand-trial statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Turner, Albert James
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-10-30· cited 223×
• Turner, Albert James
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-21
• Carr, Thomas Raymond
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-13
• Petetan, US Carnell Jr. A/K/A Carnell Petetan, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-27
• Billy Ray Pegues v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2022-09-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dusky v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
• Ex Parte Hagans
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-09· cited 49×
• Corley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-02-21· cited 46×
• Ex Parte Long
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-04-19· cited 14×