Skip to main content
· 1/22/2024

Ex Parte Lonnie Kade Welsh v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that although judicial acceptance of a party’s prior position is not an absolute prerequisite for judicial estoppel, it is “obviously more appropriate” in that situation
  • applying judicial estoppel to the mixed question of whether an employment relationship existed
  • judicial estoppel is “not necessarily confined to situations where the party asserting the earlier contrary position there prevailed”
  • judicial estoppel is basis for affirming trial court granting JNOV on other related grounds
  • “In certain circumstances a party may properly be precluded as a matter of law from adopting a legal position in conflict with one earlier taken in the same or related litigation.”
  • judicial estoppel may apply where election of remedies would not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.