· 6/15/1833
Ex parte Livingston v. Superior Court
Citations
- 10 Wend. 545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘An ambiguity can be patent, arising from the face of the writing, or latent, based on extrinsic evidence.’” (quoting Solis v. Kirkwood Resort Co., 94 Cal. App. 4th 354, 360–61 (2001))
- “[A]n ambiguity cannot be 9 created by parsing words outside their context.”
- “Where the same 13 word or phrase might have been used in the same connection in different portions of a statute but a 14 different word or phrase having different meaning is used instead, the construction employing that 15 different meaning is to be favored.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.