Ex parte: Lissette Marín Aponte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that MMWA written warranty claims may be subject to binding arbitration because the MMWA’s text, legislative history, and purpose are not in conflict with enforcement of an arbitration agreement under the FAA
• stating that \[t]he clear congressional intent in favor of enforcing valid arbitration agreements controls in this case\
• acknowledging that the text did not address the permissibility of binding arbitration clauses in consumer warranties
• acknowledging that the text did not address the permissibility of binding arbitration clauses in consumer warranties
• stating that “[t]he clear congressional intent in favor of enforcing valid arbitration agreements controls in this case”
• stating that “[t]he clear congressional intent in favor of enforcing valid arbitration agreements controls in this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).