Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/30/1979
Ex Parte Lewis
Citations
- 587 S.W.2d 697
- 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1499
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the State has a duty to disclose Brady evidence to defendants who plead guilty as well as those who go to trial
- holding that the State has a duty to disclose Brady evidence to defendants who plead guilty as well as those who go to trial
- “we hold that the prosecutor's duty to disclose favorable information (whether relating to the issue of competence, guilt, or punishment) extends to defendants who plead guilty as well as to those who plead not guilty.”
- requirement of due course of law extends to guilty pleas
- requirement of due course of law extends to guilty pleas
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Roberts, Odom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ex parte BarnabyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-11-04· cited 142×
- George Alvarez v. City of BrownsvilleFifth Circuit· 2018-09-18· cited 115×
- Matthew v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 103×
- Pena v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-04-08· cited 50×
- Manning v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1989-02-21· cited 21×
- Jerry Lee Pitman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-06-21· cited 21×
- Christopher Rios v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-07-05· cited 17×
- Villarreal v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-08-31· cited 12×
- Byrd v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-09-29· cited 12×
- Ex Parte CashmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-05-23· cited 9×
- State v. MasonheimerTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2005-02-17· cited 8×
- Atomanczyk v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1989-08-24· cited 8×
- Killingsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-10· cited 4×
- Mansfield v. Williamson CtyFifth Circuit· 2022-03-31· cited 3×
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-08· cited 2×
- Meza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-08· cited 2×
- State v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-11-03· cited 1×
- Ronnie Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1991-05-02· cited 1×
- in the Matter of J. B.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-04-29
- Jeffrey Rouse v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-06-27
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-02-27· cited 282×
- V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-02-27· cited 229×
- Ransonette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-10-06· cited 143×
- Means v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-05-22· cited 120×
- Leslie Douglas Ashley and Carolyn Lima v. The State of TexasFifth Circuit· 1963-07-30· cited 69×
- Ex Parte HagansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-09· cited 49×
- Ex Parte ShuflinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-10-22· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.