Skip to main content

Ex Parte Lawson

Citations

  • 6 So. 3d 7
  • 2008 WL 2780780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if Restatement § 7.6 applies, purchase-money lenders could not subrogate to a construction loan because the seller would reap the benefit of a subcontractor’s work without paying for it
  • holding that even if Restatement § 7.6 applies, purchase-money lenders could not subrogate to a construction loan because the seller would reap the benefit of a 17 THE WEITZ COMPANY v. NICHOLAS HETH et al. OPINION OF THE COURT subcontractor’s work without paying for it
  • “The materialman’s lien statutes ‘are an expression of legislative intent that should stay the hand of equity in this situation. If we held otherwise, we would violate the equitable maxim that equity follows the law.’ ”
  • discussed infra, identifying the position expressed in Restatement (Third

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bolin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.