Texas Supreme Court· 6/13/1962
Ex Parte Jones
Citations
- 358 S.W.2d 370
- 163 Tex. 513
- 1962 Tex. LEXIS 668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that judgment based on terms of settlement agreement must be interpreted under law of contracts rather than law of judgments
- holding that judgment based on terms of settlement agreement must be interpreted under law of contracts rather than law of judgments
- holding that judgment based on terms of settlement agreement must be interpreted under law of contracts rather than law of judgments
- “This agreed judgment must be interpreted as if it were a contract . . . and the interpretation thereof is governed by the laws relating to contracts, rather than laws relating to judgments.”
- ―This agreed judgment must be interpreted as if it were a contract . . . and the interpretation thereof is governed by the laws relating to contracts, rather than laws relating to judgments.‖
- “This agreed judgment must be interpreted as if it were a contract . . . and the interpretation thereof is governed by the laws relating to contracts, rather than laws relating to judgments.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court· 1966-05-18· cited 214×
- Francis v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court· 1967-03-01· cited 148×
- Gracia v. RC Cola-7-Up Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1984-04-04· cited 138×
- McGoodwin v. McGoodwinTexas Supreme Court· 1984-06-20· cited 105×
- In Re CoppockTexas Supreme Court· 2009-02-13· cited 69×
- McCray v. McCrayTexas Supreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 66×
- Miller v. MillerTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-11-13· cited 66×
- Ex Parte RamzyTexas Supreme Court· 1968-01-31· cited 65×
- Hutchings v. BatesTexas Supreme Court· 1966-07-13· cited 49×
- Cardwell v. Sicola-CardwellTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-10-15· cited 28×
- Forney v. JorrieCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1974-05-08· cited 27×
- Conner v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-31· cited 23×
- Akin v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1967-07-05· cited 21×
- Peddicord v. PeddicordCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-03-27· cited 21×
- Price v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1968-03-26· cited 21×
- Woolam v. TussingTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-02· cited 20×
- Ex Parte BuckhananTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1981-10-15· cited 20×
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-01-28· cited 15×
- Duke v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-11-10· cited 15×
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1985-05-22· cited 14×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Edwards v. GiffordTexas Supreme Court· 1941-11-05· cited 73×
- Ex parte FisherTexas Supreme Court· 1948-01-21· cited 57×
- Ex Parte TylerTexas Supreme Court· 1953-10-07· cited 36×
- Mobley v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1949-04-06· cited 32×
- Ex Parte La RoccaTexas Supreme Court· 1955-10-12· cited 30×
- Turman v. TurmanTexas Supreme Court· 1933-11-01· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.