Skip to main content

Ex Parte Jones

Citations

  • 358 S.W.2d 370
  • 163 Tex. 513
  • 1962 Tex. LEXIS 668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judgment based on terms of settlement agreement must be interpreted under law of contracts rather than law of judgments
  • holding that judgment based on terms of settlement agreement must be interpreted under law of contracts rather than law of judgments
  • holding that judgment based on terms of settlement agreement must be interpreted under law of contracts rather than law of judgments
  • “This agreed judgment must be interpreted as if it were a contract . . . and the interpretation thereof is governed by the laws relating to contracts, rather than laws relating to judgments.”
  • ―This agreed judgment must be interpreted as if it were a contract . . . and the interpretation thereof is governed by the laws relating to contracts, rather than laws relating to judgments.‖
  • “This agreed judgment must be interpreted as if it were a contract . . . and the interpretation thereof is governed by the laws relating to contracts, rather than laws relating to judgments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.