Skip to main content

Ex Parte Jones

Citations

  • 97 S.W.3d 586
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28
  • 2003 WL 246063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that frivolous filings waste scarce judicial and fiscal resources and citing the applicant for abuse of the writ
  • noting that frivolous filings waste scarce judicial and fiscal resources and citing the applicant for abuse of the writ
  • stating that the denial of a frivolous initial writ application under Article 11.07 acts as a bar to filing any further writ applications, except in those extraordinary situations set out in Article 11.07, § 4
  • “[I]n this era of governmental 2 budgetary restraint, we cannot condone the waste of scarce judicial and fiscal resources that frivolous filings cause.”
  • “[I]n this era of governmental budgetary restraint, we cannot condone the waste of scarce judicial and fiscal resources that frivolous filings cause.”
  • the SPU “has authority to prosecute inmate offenses in an appropriate venue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.