Ex Parte Johnson Land Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a \motion for rehearing\ of the dismissal of an action was a Rule 59 motion
• holding that trial judge's oral statement that he would \ 'go over the facts and enter an order at a later date' \ was not an order granting or denying postjudgment motion
• \[T]he operation of Rule 59.1 makes no distinction based upon whether the failure to rule appears to be 'inadvertent [or] deliberate ... [or] any other type of failure.' \ (quoting Howard v. McMillian, 480 So. 2d 1251, 1252 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985))
• \[T]he operation of Rule 59.1 makes no distinction based upon whether the failure to rule appears to be 'inadvertent [or] deliberate ... [or] any other type of failure.' \ (quoting Howard v. McMillian , 480 So.2d 1251 , 1252 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).