Ex Parte Jefferson County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mandamus petition was not the appropriate procedural vehicle for presenting the issue of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that a mandamus petition was not the appropriate procedural vehicle for presenting the issue of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Flint Construction
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-07-28· cited 126×
• Ex Parte Barrows
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-05-07· cited 4×
• Bowdoin v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2003-08-22· cited 3×
• Shields v. Estate of Shields
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-05-07

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-07-31· cited 150×
• Ex Parte Fowler
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-12-07· cited 60×
• Ex Parte Spears
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-04-30· cited 55×
• Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System v. Talley
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1973-07-05· cited 36×
• Armstrong v. Roger's Outdoor Sports, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-09-07· cited 27×
• Ex Parte St. Vincent's Hosp.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1994-09-02· cited 26×
• Ex Parte Northport Health Service, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-07-19· cited 25×
• In Re Dale County v. Dothan-Houston County Airport Authority
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1968-05-23· cited 20×
• City of Mobile v. Salter
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1971-11-24· cited 17×
• Busch Jewelry Company v. City of Bessemer
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1957-10-31· cited 15×
• Bratton v. City of Florence
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-12-20· cited 15×
• Fairhope Single Tax Corp. v. Rezner
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-09-11· cited 13×