Ex Parte Jacob Martinez v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of bias sufficient to require recusal of a judge must come from an extrajudicial source, rather than merely from unfavorable rulings
• holding that evidence of bias sufficient to require recusal of a judge must come from an extrajudicial source, rather than merely from unfavorable rulings
• holding that charges of judicial bias and partiality cannot be established solely by “expressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance, and even anger”
• holding that charges of judicial bias and partiality cannot be established solely by “expressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance, and even anger”
• holding that a judge is not biased or prejudiced if the judge forms opinions as a result of knowledge obtained in earlier proceedings
• holding that “judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).