Ex Parte Heylman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one crime is “included in the other” so that the convictions should merge for sentencing when one of the crimes is “established by proof of the same or less than all of the facts”
• “Where . . . each offense requires an element of proof beyond the degree of injury or culpability that the other does not, neither of the offenses is included in the other, and the crimes do not merge under OCGA §§ 16-1-7 (a) (1) [and] 16-1-6.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).