Skip to main content
· 9/28/1887

Ex parte Henshaw

Citations

  • 73 Cal. 486
  • 15 P. 110
  • 1887 Cal. LEXIS 701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the failure to serve a defendant in fi. fa. under OCGA § 48-4-45 (a) (1) (A
  • holding that a party who was given notice of a tax sale as statutorily required “may not attack the sale on the ground of lack of notice to another part/’
  • holding that a party who was given notice of a tax sale as statutorily required \may not attack the sale on the ground of lack of notice to another party\
  • holding that a party who was given notice of a tax 9 This Court has previously cited Lujan in assessing standing under Georgia law. See Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Roswell, 283 Ga. 417, 418 (658 SE2d 587) (2008
  • “The surveyor’s testimony to the contrary was a legal conclusion and, as such, cannot be considered as evidence on motion for summary judgment.”
  • mere statement in affidavit that notice was “published ‘as required by law’ ” was a legal conclusion that did not establish the fact that bank had complied with foreclosure notice requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, McKinstry, Paterson, Searls, Sharpstein, Temple, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.