Ex parte Hayes
Citations
- 98 Cal. 555
- 20 L.R.A. 701
- 33 P. 337
- 1893 Cal. LEXIS 957
Syllabus
<p>Constitutional Law—Police Power—Regulation of Liquor Traffic—Withholding of Lioenses—Munioipal Ordinance.—An ordinance of the city and county of San Francisco, making it unlawful to sell liquors without a license, and providing that no license shall be issued to persons engaged in the sale of liquors in dance-cellars or dance-halls, or in places where musical, or theatrical, or other public exhibitions are given, and where females attend as waitresses, is a valid exercise of the power conferred by section 11 of article XI. of the constitution upon counties, cities, and towns to make “all such local, police, sanitary, or other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws.”</p> <p>Id. — Disqualification on Account of Sex. — Such ordinance does not violate section 18 of article XX. of the constitution, prohibiting disqualification of any person on account of sex “from entering or pursuing any lawful business, vocation, or profession,” which section does not operate as a limitation upon the power of the state or its municipalities to prescribe the conditions upon which the business of retailing intoxicating liquors shall be permitted to be carried on, or in regulating the manner in which such business shall be conducted.</p>
Judges: Beatty, McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoNinth Circuit· 2001-12-11· cited 88×
- In Re MakiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-01-14· cited 37×
- Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-09-25· cited 30×
- Foster v. Bd. of Police Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-05-22· cited 29×
- Schaub's Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-09-18· cited 27×
- City of Tacoma v. KeiselWashington Supreme Court· 1912-06-08· cited 17×
- People v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court· 1908-05-26· cited 10×
- Sibert v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-04-13· cited 9×
- Kirchhubel v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-03-19· cited 8×
- Hargens v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-06-28· cited 5×
- Thomas v. SaundersSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 1×
- People v. JemnezAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1942-01-27
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.