Skip to main content
· 2/14/1930

Ex parte Hatem

Citations

  • 38 F.2d 226
  • 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the county’s deci- sion was not entitled to deference because the order did not interpret the relevant term
  • explaining that a local government must determine the legal status of a unit of land at issue in connection with a land use proceeding when determination of legal status is required by state or local legislation
  • explaining that local government must deter- mine legal status of unit of land at issue in connection with Cite as 335 Or App 543 (2024) 547 a land use proceeding when determination of legal status is required by state or local legislation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.