Ex Parte Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while calling a child common to the parties may be distasteful, it is not prohibited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jethrow v. Jethrow
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-11-28· cited 11×
• Glaze v. Glaze
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1985-06-26· cited 8×
• Cooper v. Cooper
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2014-08-15· cited 8×
• Bebee v. Hargrove
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1992-08-28· cited 7×
• Blume v. Durrett
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1997-04-04· cited 6×
• Reeves v. Fancher
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2016-05-20· cited 5×
• Ellison v. Ellison
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1993-09-24· cited 4×
• Harris v. Harris
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1984-12-12· cited 2×
• Curtis Lee Johnson v. State of Alabama
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-05-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hepler v. Hepler
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1954-01-25· cited 34×
• Kreutzer v. Kreutzer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-02-21· cited 23×
• Callicott v. Callicott
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1963-01-24· cited 22×
• Bole v. Bole
  California Court of Appeal· 1946-10-03· cited 18×
• Morrone v. Morrone
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-03-25· cited 16×
• Crownover v. Crownover
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-07· cited 13×
• Harris v. Harris
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1984-05-23· cited 5×
• Nichols
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-03-07· cited 4×
• Schafer v. Schafer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-03-30· cited 3×
• Louks v. Louks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1951-12-05· cited 1×