Ex Parte Greathouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that error could be harmless when the evidence of the defendant’s guilt is “virtually ironclad”
• holding that the proper harmless-error inquiry asks, absent the improperly introduced evidence, \is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury would have returned a verdict of guilty\
• acknowledging the possibility that prejudicial error could be harmless, however, when the evidence of the defendant's guilt is \virtually ironclad\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).