Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/27/1968
Ex Parte Gray
Citations
- 426 S.W.2d 241
- 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a document that contains the wrong title but has all essential elements of a judgment of sentence will suffice as a judgment
- a document that contains the wrong title but has all essential elements of a judgment of sentence will suffice as a judgment
- copy of indictment together with judgment of conviction sufficient to extradite to another state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stelbacky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-18· cited 30×
- Spatola v. United StatesE.D. New York· 1990-07-09· cited 15×
- Ex Parte RobbinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-13· cited 9×
- Ex Parte SmithTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1981-10-21· cited 5×
- Ex parte BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-02-18· cited 5×
- Ex parte McConnellCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-18· cited 4×
- State ex rel. Wright v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-21· cited 2×
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-10-06· cited 1×
- Ray Zepeda Sanchez Jr. v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2011-01-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.