Ex parte Gibson
Citations
- 31 Cal. 619
Syllabus
<p>Commitment to State Prison.—A commitment to the State Prison on conviction and sentence for a felony, should consist of a certified copy of the judgment as entered in the minutes of the Court.</p> <p>Idem.—A commitment to the State Prison which does not contain a certified copy of the judgment as entered in the minutes of the Court, hut which consists only of a history of the proceedings against the prisoner, is not merely defective, hut is wholly unknown to the laws of this State.</p> <p>When Prisoner will Vbe Remanded.—If it appears on habeas corpus that the commitment to the State Prison-under which the prisoner is held, is void, and if it further appears that there is a valid judgment of imprisonment against the petitioner, rendered by a competent Court of criminal jurisdiction, of which a certified copy can be obtained, the Court or Judge will order the prisoner to he retained until a certified copy of the judgment has been obtained, or until a reasonable time has been allowed for that purpose, and then, if obtained, remand him.</p> <p>Errors reached by Habeas Corpus.—A prisoner, committed on final process, will not be discharged on habeas corpus, by reason of defects in the judgment, unless the judgment is absolutely void. Mere errors, however flagrant, which only render a judgment voidable, cannot be inquired into under this writ.</p> <p>Voidable Judgment.—An error which will render a judgment in a criminal case voidable, only, is the want of adherence to some prescribed rule or mode of proceeding in conducting the action or defense.</p> <p>Void Judgments.— An illegality which renders a judgment in a criminal case void, is such an illegality as is contrary to the principles of law as distinguished from rules of procedure.</p> <p>Judgment in Criminal Case.—An entry of a judgment, in a criminal case, in the minutes of the Court, ought to show that all the acts required by the statute to be done up to that stage of the case have been performed.</p> <p>Idem.—W
Judges: Sanderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-12-03· cited 162×
- Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1950-12-12· cited 71×
- Sennott's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-04-06· cited 57×
- Ex-parte BowenSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-01-15· cited 48×
- State ex rel. Boner v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1964-07-17· cited 47×
- United States v. MulveySecond Circuit· 1916-04-18· cited 39×
- Ex parte LargentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1942-04-08· cited 37×
- Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court· 1897-08-31· cited 36×
- Vasquez v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-02-15· cited 30×
- Ex parte DegenerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1891-12-19· cited 30×
- Michael v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-04-10· cited 28×
- In re BionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-09-12· cited 25×
- People ex rel. Hutchinson v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court· 1900-12-20· cited 25×
- Ex parte McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court· 1868-07-01· cited 23×
- State v. SmithNevada Supreme Court· 1875-04-15· cited 22×
- Hambrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-11-08· cited 18×
- Saner-Ragley Lumber Co. v. SpiveyTexas Commission of Appeals· 1922-03-15· cited 16×
- People v. CantrellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-11-15· cited 15×
- Ex parte DickersonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1891-12-05· cited 13×
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1953-12-15· cited 11×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.