Ex parte G.D. and S.D. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: G.D. and S.D. v. S.R.S. and R.H.S.) (Tallapoosa Juvenile Court: JU-16-132.03; Civil Appeals: CL-2024-0768).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting adverse employment actions under 878 Mercado v. Rogue Disposal & Recycling, Inc. former ORS 659A.030(1)(f) (2021) include broader conduct than “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” cov- ered under a whistleblowing claim under ORS 659A.199
• “When there is no evidence from which a reasonable trier of fact could find facts sufficient to establish an element of the party’s claim, the opposing party is entitled to a directed verdict on the claim.”
• “When there is no evidence from which a reasonable trier of fact could find facts sufficient to establish an element of the party’s claim, the opposing party is entitled to a directed verdict on the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).