Ex parte Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence that differed in kind from one authorized by statute was void but a sentence that exceeded the one authorized by statute was voidable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Huffman v. Alexander
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-12-06· cited 82×
• Barker v. Ireland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-06-10· cited 64×
• Smallman v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1955-12-30· cited 41×
• Harlow v. Clow
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-02-26· cited 26×
• State v. Froembling
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-04-15· cited 22×
• Alexander v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1955-10-05· cited 11×
• Ex parte Holliway
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1917-10-08· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Jung Shing
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1915-01-19· cited 8×
• Ex parte Wessens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1918-09-24· cited 8×
• State v. Keys
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-06-10· cited 7×
• In re Shaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1918-04-02· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nielsen
  Supreme Court· 1889-05-13· cited 642×
• Ex parte Mooney
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1885-06-27· cited 74×
• Ex parte Tice
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1897-08-31· cited 36×
• Harrington v. Jones
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1909-02-23· cited 28×
• Martin v. District Court
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1906-04-15· cited 25×
• Bishop
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1898-09-21· cited 24×
• De Bara v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1900-02-12· cited 21×
• Ex parte Stacey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1904-03-28· cited 14×
• In re Nolan
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1904-03-12· cited 14×
• In re Butler
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1904-12-14· cited 7×