Skip to main content
· 5/19/2010

Ex Parte Florence

Citations

  • 319 S.W.3d 695
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 617
  • 2010 WL 1979432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if a trial court denies a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc, relief may be sought by filing a petition for writ of mandamus
  • observing that jail-time-credit claims should be made by filing nunc pro tunc motion with convicting court
  • providing that appropriate remedy for denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file an application for writ of mandamus in a court of appeals
  • providing that the appropriate remedy for denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file an application for writ of mandamus in a court of appeals
  • noting that the remedy for the trial court’s failure to respond to a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is a mandamus petition filed in the appropriate court of appeals
  • noting that the remedy for the trial court's failure to respond to a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is a mandamus petition filed in the appropriate court of appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.