Ex Parte Ellison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• one of two convictions in same trial reversed, in absence of objection, because both nonproperty offenses arose from same transaction
• one of two convictions in same trial reversed, in absence of objection, because both nonproperty offenses arose from same transaction
• one of two convictions in same trial reversed, in absence of objection, because both nonproperty offenses arose from the same trans action
• presence of one transaction is \obvious\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Callins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-27· cited 134×
• Ex Parte Drake
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-14· cited 86×
• Ex Parte Pena
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-11· cited 54×
• Holcomb v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-27· cited 49×
• Willeford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-09· cited 38×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-12-23· cited 5×
• Villarreal v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-02-13· cited 2×
• Lucas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-06· cited 2×
• Gonzales, Jose Iii
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-04-22
• Hardeman, Willie Eugene
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-19

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Drake v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 85×
• Ex Parte Siller
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 85×
• Ex Parte Easley
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-02-21· cited 53×