Ex Parte Ebert Onas Acosta Mejia v. .

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “bears the burden 25 of proving the first two prongs” of the specific personal jurisdiction test, including “(1
• explaining that a party seeking declaratory relief must demonstrate Article III standing
• resolving a 26 factual attack to jurisdiction in a declaratory judgment action concerning trademark 27 infringement
• finding plaintiff lacked Article III standing to seek declaratory judgment as to the validity of common law trademark where an infringement suit was “extremely unlikely” and plaintiff demonstrated no “‘self-avoidance’ of harm”
• cancellation of a trademark registration is merely a remedy for trademark infringement, not a separate cause of action
• “The existence of a case or controversy is a question of law we review de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).