Ex parte Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The provisions cited are intended to fix the minimum, and not the maximum, limit for the pronouncing of judgment. They are intended to prevent hasty and ill considered judgments [.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clark v. State
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-07-23· cited 39×
• Helton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-10-29· cited 37×
• State ex rel. Anderson v. Jameson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1927-10-22· cited 13×
• Application of Abelt
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1966-10-12· cited 6×
• Nelson v. Foley
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1929-01-26· cited 6×
• State v. Dawson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neal v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1898-05-24· cited 78×
• Ledgerwood v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1893-02-23· cited 39×
• In re Taylor
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1895-08-30· cited 28×
• State ex rel. Payne v. Anderson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1921-03-10· cited 21×
• Cook v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1917-04-11· cited 14×
• People v. Felix
  California Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 12×
• State v. Schaller
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1926-02-08· cited 8×
• State ex rel. Callahan v. Hughes
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1925-02-10· cited 6×
• In re Jackson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1920-06-05· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Horner v. Taylor
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1923-12-21· cited 3×