Ex Parte Diversey Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party must object to inadmissible evidence by moving to strike the evidence
• holding that ‘the court can consider inadmissible evidence if the party against whom it is offered does not object to the evidence by moving to strike it’
• requiring a motion to strike matters not in compliance with Rule 56(e)
• \`\Proof which goes no further than to show an injury could have occurred in an alleged way, does not warrant the conclusion that it did so occur, where from the same proof the injury can with equal probability be attributed to some other cause.\'\
• \ 1 \Proof which goes no further than to show an injury could have occurred in an alleged way, does not warrant the conclusion that it did so occur, where from the same proof the injury can with equal probability be attributed to some other cause.\'\
• “Proof which goes no further than to show an injury could have occurred in an alleged way, does not warrant the conclusion that it did so occur, where from the same proof the injury can with equal probability be attributed to some other cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).