Ex parte Diggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Plaintiffs counsel’s inability to cross-examine a Psychiatric Resident during military administrative review proceedings did not violate the Fifth Amendment
• holing that the Confrontation Clause did not apply to hearings before a military Medical Evaluation Board, or the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).