Supreme Court of Alabama· 3/10/1960
Ex parte Cunningham
Citations
- 270 Ala. 300
- 118 So. 2d 757
- 1960 Ala. LEXIS 308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “orderly procedure requires that a determination first be made as to whether a right to an accounting exists; and ... if ... petitioners are entitled to such relief, they ‘will be given full benefit of securing discovery of all such legal evidence as will assist in such accounting’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwyn, Simpson, Stakely, Merrill, Coleman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court· 1933-05-29· cited 220×
- Charles Sales Corp. v. RovengerSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-06-15· cited 58×
- Manning v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-12-11· cited 27×
- Lee v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama· 1937-06-24· cited 20×
- Harris v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court· 1921-06-22· cited 18×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Dictograph Products Co.D. Delaware· 1947-02-28· cited 17×
- Warden v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1950-09-19· cited 12×
- Cunningham v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama· 1958-05-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.