Skip to main content
· 12/5/1910

Ex parte Cudahy Packing Co.

Citations

  • 218 U.S. 668
  • 31 S. Ct. 228
  • 54 L. Ed. 1203
  • 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A child who has never been gainfully employed may recover damages for impairment of his future earning capacity, if “proved to a reasonable degree of certainty.”
  • “Where an objection is made to an instruction for the first time on appeal and such instruction is not so deficient so as to require invocation of the ‘plain error’ rule, in consonance with Rule 51, W.Va.R.C.P., this Court will not consider the late objection.”
  • “ ‘[w]here an objection is made to an instruction for the first time on appeal and such instruction is not so deficient so as to require invocation of the “plain error” rule, in consonance with Rule 51, W.Va. R.C.P. [sic ], this Court will not consider the late objection’ ”
  • entering a conditional remit-titur of $4,977.47

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.