Skip to main content
· 9/19/1979

Ex Parte Crossley

Citations

  • 586 S.W.2d 545
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying former article 42.03 § 2 and stating “[o]n the face of it, the applicant was not confined in the same cause for which he was sentenced”
  • applying former article 42.03 § 2 and stating “[o]n the face of it, the applicant was not confined in the same cause for which he was sentenced”
  • applying former article 42.03 § 2 and stating “[o]n the face of it, the applicant was not confined in the same cause for which he was sentenced”
  • stating, under the precedessor of code of criminal procedure article 42.03, section 2, that “[o]n the face of it, the applicant was not confined in the same cause for which he was sentenced”
  • stating, under the precedessor of code of criminal procedure article 42.03, section 2, that “[o]n the face of it, the applicant was not confined in the same cause for which he was sentenced”
  • “On the face of it, the applicant was not confined in the same cause for which he was sentenced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.