Ex Parte Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proof that person was in possession of a writing generally warrants a finding or presumption that such person knew the contents of said writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whitlow v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-04-14· cited 97×
• Carpenter v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-06-30· cited 85×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-01-26· cited 22×
• Nance v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-10-12· cited 19×
• Waldrop v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-04-28· cited 13×
• Ingle v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-06-08· cited 10×
• Roberts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-03-20· cited 6×
• Holman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-11-13· cited 2×
• Black v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-11-25
• Cook v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-03-29