Ex Parte Coffelt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that certain statutes requiring a defendant’s payment of a $1 fee into a parole fund were unconstitutional because they did not “bear a true relation to the expenses of [that particular] prosecution”
• where the court reversed an order taxing costs as it found those monies were not used to defray prosecution expenses but were for a parole fund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).