Ex Parte Clinton Eugene Petersen v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bad faith claims do not “substantially affect the risk pooling arrangement” between insurers and their insured
• holding the Court’s decision in Miller did not eviscerate the precedential value of pre-Miller case law
• \[A]ny court forced to enter the ERISA preemption thicket sets out on a treacherous path.\ (alteration in original) (quoting Gonzales v. Prudential Ins. Co. , 901 F.2d 446 , 451-52 (5th Cir. 1990) )
• \[A]ny court forced to enter the ERISA preemption thicket sets out on a treacherous path.\ (alteration in original) (quoting Gonzales v. Prudential Ins. Co. , 901 F.2d 446, 451-52 (5th Cir. 1990))
• \[A]ny court forced to enter the ERISA preemption thicket sets out on a treacherous path.\ (alteration in original) (quoting Gonzales v. Prudential Ins. Co. , 901 F.2d 446, 451-52 (5th Cir. 1990))
• derivative state-law consortium claim based on direct ERISA claim preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).