Ex Parte Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]n the context of an action seeking a sale for division, Rule 38(b) requires that the party make the jury demand within 30 days after the service of the last pleading pertaining to the issues on which the jury trial is demanded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte AU Hotel, Ltd.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 25×
• Ex Parte Tiffin
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-10-03· cited 11×
• State v. Van Reed
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-29· cited 7×
• Ex Parte Regions Bank
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2005-05-27· cited 5×
• Dowdell v. Stinson
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 5×
• Ex Parte Lord
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-06-28· cited 4×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-08-01· cited 4×
• Ex Parte Bush
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-05-14· cited 4×
• Ex Parte Kurtts
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1997-11-21· cited 3×
• City of Huntsville v. Neal
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-12-05· cited 2×
• Ex Parte State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-29
• Tarver v. Advanced Disposal Servs. S., LLC (Ex parte Utilities Bd. of Tuskegee)
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2018-09-28
• State v. Balams
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-05-14
• Price v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-10-03

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dorcal, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-04-24· cited 49×
• Ex Parte Leigeber
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-06-25· cited 7×