Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/2/2011
Ex Parte Chamberlain
Citations
- 335 S.W.3d 198
- 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 158
- 2011 WL 309584
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an intervening change in the law \altered the legal landscape\ and, therefore, a remand was required to consider the impact of the change on the appeal
- vacating our judgment, but not our opinion, and remanding the appeal
- vacating our judgment, but not our opinion, and remanding the appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keasler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Antonio Parra Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2018-09-27· cited 44×
- Ex Parte ChamberlainTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-30· cited 5×
- Ex Parte Bryan Scott ChamberlainTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-30
- Bradley Gregg v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2016-12-01
- State v. Jason B. McSwainSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2025-02-26
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.