Ex Parte Chabot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process is violated when the State knowingly or unknowingly uses materially false testimony to obtain a conviction
• holding that the defendant’s due process rights were violated by state’s unknowing presentation of false testimony
• holding that post-conviction DNA evidence established that the prosecution’s primary witness had perjured himself
• agreeing with convicting court that conviction based on perjured testimony violated defendant’s due process rights, notwithstanding that State had no knowledge of perjured testimony at time of trial
• applicant must prove that use of false evidence caused him harm, Hunter Concurrence - 6 not just that it was considered at all
• \The applicant did not raise this due-process claim in his first application for habeas relief. Nor could he have brought the claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).