Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/9/2009

Ex Parte Chabot

Citations

300 S.W.3d 768
2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1736
2009 WL 4640556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that due process is violated when the State knowingly or unknowingly uses materially false testimony to obtain a conviction
holding that the defendant’s due process rights were violated by state’s unknowing presentation of false testimony
holding that post-conviction DNA evidence established that the prosecution’s primary witness had perjured himself
agreeing with convicting court that conviction based on perjured testimony violated defendant’s due process rights, notwithstanding that State had no knowledge of perjured testimony at time of trial
applicant must prove that use of false evidence caused him harm, Hunter Concurrence - 6 not just that it was considered at all
\The applicant did not raise this due-process claim in his first application for habeas relief. Nor could he have brought the claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Meyers, Price, Johnson, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

124 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.